The relational dimension in management: reflections on post-disciplinarity in teamwork and the prospects for innovation
DOI:
10.16928/2316-8080.v7n1p.1-13Keywords:
Worldviews Post-disciplinarity Management InnovationAbstract
Management is being analyzed from the relational perspective, understanding that the major contemporary issues in organizations go beyond the disciplinary vision. Traditionally, the forms and concepts adopted by managers to relate with each other and with other members and professional categories in the execution of common tasks and activities are disciplinary. Each professional category builds their own worldviews and these form the basis for the attitudes and actions in managing in an environment that strives for multifunctional and multidisciplinary cooperation. The objective is, thus, under the worldviews and relational approach, encourage understanding the exercise of organizational leadership. In this sense, the study rescues the critique of disciplinarity in general, and interdisciplinarity, in particular, raises questions about teamwork and proposes a relational approach in anticipation of going beyond the (inter)disciplinary paradigm.
References
DER VEKEN, J. World views: from fragmentation to integration. Brussels, VUB Press, 1994.
BRAGA, R. Integração Terapêutica: Uma proposta transdisciplinar com base nas pesquisas da medicina e psicologia da consciência. Londrina: Universalista, 1995.
CAPRA, F. A Teia da Vida: Uma Nova Compreensão Científica dos Sistemas Vivos. São Paulo: Editora Cultrix, 1996.
COBERN, W. W. World View Theory and Science Education Research. Monografia (National Association for Research on Science Teaching), Manhattan, Kansas, USA, 1991.
DISINGER, J. F.; TOMSEN, J. L. Environmental Education Research News. The Environmentalist, n. 15, vol. 1, p. 3-9, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888884
DUBOS, R. L'Homme et l'adaptation au milieu. Payot, Paris, 1973.
IRIBARY, I. N. Aproximações sobre a transdisciplinaridade: algumas linhas históricas, fundamentos e princípios aplicados ao trabalho de equipe. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica, n. 6, vol. 3, p. 483-490, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722003000300007
JAPIASSU, H. A atitude interdisciplinar no sistema de ensino. Revista Tempo Brasileiro, v. 108, p. 83-94, 1992.
JAPIASSU, H. Interdisciplinaridade e patologia do saber. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1976.
KOLTKO-RIVERA, M. E. The Psychology of Worldviews. Review of General Psychology, n. 8, vol. 1, p. 3-58, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
MORIN, Edgar. Organization and complexity. In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, n. 879, p. 115-121, New York, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb10410.x
MOTTA, P. R. Gestão contemporânea: a ciência e a arte de ser dirigente. 13a. ed. São Paulo: Record, 2002.
SENGE, Peter et al. A Quinta disciplina: caderno de campo - estratégias e ferramentas para construir uma organização que aprende. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark, 1995.
SNOW, C. P. As duas culturas e uma Segunda leitura. São Paulo: Edusp, 1995.
TANZELLA-NITTI, Giuseppe. Unità del sapere e unità della persona: c'é ancora un campus nell'università. Scienza e Conoscenza, 2000. Publicado no dia 24/10/2014 Recebido no dia 08/10/2014 Aprovado no dia 09/10/2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The licence applicable to this article is the one stated on its own page and corresponds to the policy in force on its date of publication.
Authors are permitted to deposit the published version in institutional and subject repositories, provided the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
PIDCC charges no submission, processing or publication fees.
