Performance evaluation: a systematic review and analysis of the recent literature
DOI:
10.16928/2316-8080.v6n1p.40-63Keywords:
Performance evaluation Measurement ScalesAbstract
Performance Evaluation is a usual process in decision making contexts. Therefore, considering the importance of this process and its impact on organizations and people's lives, it is presented in this paper a systematic review of the literature present on the ScienceDirect database. After selection of the papers, a bibliometric and a content analysis are done. As a result of this paper, the most relevant publications are identified. It is also presented the improvements on the methods presented in those papers.
References
AGRELL, P. J. e B. MARTIN WEST. A caveat on the measurement of productive efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics, v.69, n.1, p.1-14. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00036-0
AHMAD, M. M. E N. DHAFR. Establishing and improving manufacturing performance measures. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, v.18, n.3-4, p.171-176. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00007-8
CRAIG, S. B. E K. HANNUM. Research Update: 360-Degree Performance Assessment. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, v.58, n.2, p.117-124. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.58.2.117
DAVIS, S. E T. ALBRIGHT. An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, v.15, n.2, p.135-153. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001
ENSSLIN, Ensslin. Palestra: Considerações quanto aos Eixos de Avaliação utilizados quando da Revisão Sistêmica da Literatura, 2010.
ENSSLIN, L., A. DUTRA, ET AL. MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency. International Transactions in Operational Research, v.7, n.1, p.79-100. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00186.x
ENSSLIN, L.; et al. Avaliação de Desempenho: Objetivos e Dimensões. I Seminário sobre Avaliação de Desempenho do Setor Público, 2007.
ENSSLIN, L. Processo Decisório e Aspectos Cognitivos. XII Simpósio de Pesquisa Operacional e Logística da Marinha, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 5-6 ago., 2009.
FACTEAU, J. D. E S. B. CRAIG. Are Performance Appraisal Ratings From Different Rating Sources Comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, v.86, n.2, p.215-227. 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.215
GREGORIOU, G. N., K. SEDZRO, et al. Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, v.164, n.2, p.555-571. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.12.019
GUNASEKARAN, A., H. J. WILLIAMS, et al. Performance measurement and costing system in new enterprise. Technovation, v.25, n.5, p.523-533. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00176-7
HARB, G. C., W. ENG, et al. Behavioral assessment of public-speaking anxiety using a modified version of the Social Performance Rating Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, v.41, n.11, p.1373-1380. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00158-X
HAUCK, K. E A. STREET. Performance assessment in the context of multiple objectives: A multivariate multilevel analysis. Journal of Health Economics, v.25, n.6, p.1029-1048. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.009
JAZAYERI, M. E R. W. SCAPENS. The Business Values Scorecard within BAE Systems: The evolution of a performance measurement system. The British Accounting Review, v.40, n.1, p.48-70. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.10.007
JESSOP, A. A multicriteria blockmodel for performance assessment. Omega, v.37, n.1, p.204-214. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.08.004
KLOOT, L. E J. MARTIN. Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government. Management Accounting Research, v.11, n.2, p.231-251. 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0130
LEE, A. H. I., W.-C. CHEN, et al. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, v.34, n.1, p.96-107. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
LIN, Y.-H., K.-M. TSAI, et al. Research on using ANP to establish a performance assessment model for business intelligence systems. Expert Systems with Applications, v.36, n.2, Part 2, p.4135-4146. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.004
MARI, L. Epistemology of measurement. Measurement, v.34, n.1, p.17-30. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2241(03)00016-2
MITCHELL DE OLIVEIRA DUTRA, ALINE FRANÇA DE ABREU, PEDRO FELIPE DE ABREU. 47 performance assessment in waste recycling Omero, M., L. 2005 D'ambrosio, et al.
MITCHELL DE OLIVEIRA DUTRA, ALINE FRANÇA DE ABREU, PEDRO FELIPE DE ABREU. 55 Dhafr (2002), Harb et al.
MITCHELL DE OLIVEIRA DUTRA, ALINE FRANÇA DE ABREU, PEDRO FELIPE DE ABREU. 57 No que se refere à participação do decisor (contexto social), Ensslin et al. (2000), Agrell e West (2001), Ahmad e Dhafr (2002), Harb et al.
MITCHELL DE OLIVEIRA DUTRA, ALINE FRANÇA DE ABREU, PEDRO FELIPE DE ABREU. 61 empregados. (Apostila da disciplina EPS 7007 - Avaliação de Desempenho; 1º semestre, 2007; Florianópolis - UFSC, 2007).
MITCHELL DE OLIVEIRA DUTRA, ALINE FRANÇA DE ABREU, PEDRO FELIPE DE ABREU. 63 TAN, W., W. SHEN, et al. A methodology for dynamic enterprise process performance evaluation. Computers in Industry, v.58, n.5, p.474-485. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.10.001
MITRI, M. Applying tacit knowledge management techniques for performance assessment. Computers & Education, v.41, n.2, p.173-189. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00034-4
NASIRI, F. E G. HUANG. A fuzzy decision aid model for environmental performance assessment in waste recycling. Environmental Modelling & Software, v.23, n.6, p.677-689. 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.04.009
OMERO, M., L. D'AMBROSIO, et al. Multiple-attribute decision support system based on fuzzy logic for performance assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, v.160, n.3, p.710-725. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.035
ROSSI, G. B. E F. CRENNA. A probabilistic approach to measurement-based decisions. Measurement, v.39, n.2, p.101-119. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2005.10.011
ROY, B. Decision science or decision-aid science? European Journal of Operational Research, v. 66, n. 2, p. 184-203, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90312-B
SGOUROU, E., P. KATSAKIORI, et al. Assessment of selected safety performance evaluation methods in regards to their conceptual, methodological and practical characteristics. Safety Science, v.In Press, Corrected Proof. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.001
SONG, M.-K. E S. M. SEREIKA. An evaluation of the Decisional Conflict Scale for measuring the quality of end-of-life decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, v.61, n.3, p.397-404. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.003
SUN, S. Measuring the relative efficiency of police precincts using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v.36, n.1, p.51-71. 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(01)00010-6
UGWU, O. O. E T. C. HAUPT. Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability--a South African construction industry perspective. Building and Environment, v.42, n.2, p.665-680. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.10.018
UGWU, O. O., M. M. KUMARASWAMY, et al. Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods. Automation in Construction, v.15, n.2, p.239-251. 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.05.006
WOEHR, D. J., M. K. SHEEHAN, et al. Assessing Measurement Equivalence Across Rating Sources: A Multitrait-Multirater Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, v.90, n.3, p.592-600. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.592
YANG, J.-B., B. Y. H. WONG, et al. Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods. European Journal of Operational Research, v.195, n.1, p.205-222. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright in their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The licence applicable to this article is the one stated on its own page and corresponds to the policy in force on its date of publication.
Authors are permitted to deposit the published version in institutional and subject repositories, provided the original publication in this journal is acknowledged.
PIDCC charges no submission, processing or publication fees.
